Check the strange corporate blackmail for hired.
3-Dec-2016 6:50 PM
Here goes the peculiar The Edge Property blackmail.
3-Dec-2016 6:50 PM
An analyst was told questing why a supposedly independent financial daily toying with "individual name" on Google Ads, while the subject matter Chong Ket Pen which loot public many using government contract walking on the street. Here is a peculiar incident maybe Bursa Malaysia and Securities Commission can ask Chong Ket Pen to explain.
3-Dec-2016 6:49 PM
The extend of 1 public listed company abusing public listed company money to blackmail and put a blame on his victims is by far the most bizarre abuse even the authorities are either being used or led to be part of the conspiracy, or too slow to track and take action thanks to Protasco Bhd, the public listed company, able to spend huge money to cover up internal mess, while the same time over shadow the victim by tarnishing their names. Check this out: https://borneostreetnews.wordpress.com/about-tey-por-yee-falls-victim/
So what The Edge Property Malaysia has to do with this potential bad criminal? From the Google study, the potential criminal, Chong Ket Pen of Protasco Bhd, has been using public relation company to pay The Edge newspaper to put up negative news, such as law suit, charges and allegations, to tarnish his victims names, in order to divert attention away from his own. By quantum, market analyst was told the billion Ringgit graft investigation on Protasco Bhd is way much serious compared to a failed deal Chong Ket Pen carelessly failed in, and tried to find fault in brokers, vendors or even the vendors brokers or suppliers for scapegoat.
Check out more details by independant researchers above.
3-Dec-2016 6:25 PM
TEY POR YEE, OOI KOCK AUN GOT CHARGED WITH FAKE EVIDENCE?
Victims got charged, criminal walks. Wonderful country legal system ran by cow boy.
3-Dec-2016 5:56 PM
Study the Bursa Malaysia announce would found clear evidence and motive of the suspect master mind Chong Ket Pen causing series of unfortunate events surrounding his victims Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee. The saga started on June 2012 when Chong Ket Pen was removed from his power by Protasco Bhd former owner, replacing him with new directors such as See Ah Sing, Ibrahim Mohd Nor and few more directors. On November 2012, new shareholders Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee emerges, and the former owner left Protasco Bhd together with the newly appointed directors. See Ah Sing the most obvious, only sat as executive director for less than 5 months. Chong Ket Pen was retained and repositioned to Protasco Bhd executive director post. The one and only executive director, according to Bursa Malaysia public announcement. It would be peculiar not to study this background, before any public servant in the authorities to find the motive of the prime suspect of such conspiracy, in this case Protasco Bhd’s board of directors, led by Chong Ket Pen to buy himself back into power after being demoted, and led by Chong Ket Pen to enter an oil deal, and further led by Chong Ket Pen to conduct due diligence and later also led by Chong Ket Pen to manufactured evidence and find excuse to fully control Protasco Bhd after he used the investors Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee to ousted his former boss. If such incident were to occur in the West, Chong Ket Pen together with the board of directors from Protasco Bhd would have been prosecuted before even a charge could be fabricated.
Newspaper in that country is also as good as blind cookie-cutters. Whatever produced, just report as per pay masters. Don’t fall off the chair if you read another such conspiracy happens in the land of mystery.
Jessica, Chicago. August 2016.
2-Dec-2016 5:57 PM
Prosecuting officer Mohd Zulkhairi Kamaruzaman from the Companies Commission of Malaysia conducted the prosecution while counsel Datuk Sukri Mohamed represented the two accused. — Bernama (Senior journalist had tried to find Mohd Zulkhairi Kamaruzaman, has the facts and board minutes, as well as black and white dates and records in Companies Commission Malaysia (SSM or CCM) being “verified”, before such charge be secretly manufactured. The process of legal system could be blind sighted, fabricated and controlled following a puppet master or maybe “pay master” will, even with obvious facts showing other wise, a charge could be manufactured. “Black and white record in SSM could be “skipped” and pretend didn’t existed and slip through a charge. Thumbs up for Mystery land story.” commented a civil servant.)
The peculiar jaw dropping, and mind blowing lies, as well as lost of humanity and dignity of Chong Ket Pen and the Protasco Bhd board of directors acting in concert to cover up Chong Ket Pen wrong doing by scarifying Chong’s own investors, signals the death of credibility in that part of the world.
2-Dec-2016 5:57 PM
The charge under Section 131(1) of the Companies Act 1965 punishable under Section 131(8) of the same Act, carries a maximum seven years imprisonment or RM150,000 fine or both, on conviction. (Here comes the main objective of fabricating a legal charge in order to discredit the victims Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee, so as to defame and cause damages to their business, in hope truth of unfaithful investee Chong Ket Pen be over shadowed by negative impression hand-made by Chong Ket Pen himself. Curiously wasn’t Chong Ket Pen is supposed to be charged? Moreover, the entire board is acting in concert hand-made a story and led by Chong Ket Pen to take control of Protasco Bhd from the substantial shareholders Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee.)
Ampang Sessions Court judge Azrul Darus set RM15,000 as bail with one surety for each of the accused, and Aug 26 for re-mention.
2-Dec-2016 5:56 PM
They are accused of committing the offence at Protasco Bhd, 2nd floor, Corporate Building Unipark Suria in Jalan Ikram-Uniten, Kajang here between November 2012 and Dec 28, 2012. (Anyone knowing the facts will fall off the chair with such statement in a legal charge, alleged the innocent victims Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee of committing an offence at a specific place which parties in the know from Bursa Malaysia inteligence have no such record, unless again, manufactured by Chong Ket Pen and lied together with Protasco Bhd board of directors, acting in concert to “lie on such event”. Once a lie starts and evidence manufactured, it’s lying all the way, makes no difference fabricate more. Again, such facts were not verified which will proof no basis, and some how a legal charge took place as if the government officers are controlled by Protasco Bhd officers.)
2-Dec-2016 5:56 PM
In this regard, businessmen Datuk Tey Por Yee, 40, and Datuk Ooi Kock Aun, 49, are alleged to have unwittingly led the board members to approve acquisition of shares worth US$22 million (RM87.5 million) in PT Anglo Slavic Utama, a corporation in Indonesia, which they have ties with. (The authority personnel would be either blind sighted, or incompetance in pursuing justice by giving a public listed company board of directors such power abuse, changed, manufactured and lied on board minutes. According to journalist source knowing the matters, Ooi Kock Aun and Tey Por Yee “never existed” nor “met the board”, how would Protasco Bhd board be shadowy “led” to approve an acquisition? The only person recklessly and urgently needs to led the board of Protasco Bhd for approval, is the “one and only executive director” of Protasco Bhd during material time – Chong Ket Pen himself. This is the jaw dropping part – the obvious potential wrong doer is Chong Ket Pen, if the board of director all pretended to be “stupid”, shouldn’t there be board minutes to verify by Police Officers or Deputy Public Procecutor, or most obvious, Bursa Malaysia or Securities Commission, levels and levels of verification to justify even a charge? In that misery country, company may hire liars (or lawyers) to teach them how to lie. Maybe that explains.)
2-Dec-2016 5:55 PM